I have two new pet peeves. The first is when people post a new facebook status that in some way describes how busy they are. If you are so busy, why are you spending time on facebook? It doesn't make any sense! The second is when a team brings in their closer in a non save situation to 'get work' and he gets lit up for 4 runs in an 8 run game. How is it possible that this consistently happens? I read in a yahoosports article that they would like it to be possible to pull closers in non save situations rather than having the stats count. I'm on board. As someone who follows baseball closely, had a pretty good playing career, and is a current high school coach, it's amazing to me that a closers mentality is so different when it comes to these situations. I believe the politically incorrect term is 'mental midget'.
70%. I'm sticking with that number as what I think the percentage of baseball players using steroids at it's peak was. I've heard 50%, and up to 80%, but the one I've heard most is 70. I bring this up because another legend has fallen in the past 10 days. Manny Ramirez is a performance enhancing drug user. He joins ARod, Bonds, McGuire, and Clemens as the face of the steroid era. I have what I consider a unique view on PED's. I don't care. I really don't. What I don't think is discussed enough is how this was part of the culture of baseball. The key word is culture. When you live and work in a certain environment and something like PEDs are so prevalent it takes a strong person to avoid them. In the case of baseball, only about 30% did.
I've heard arguments calling for asterisks, calling players cheaters, people calling for the other 103 names to be released from 2003, and fans calling out teams and organizations for being steroid hot beds and I think it's a joke. When the number is 70%, every organization had someone doing it, and no one would surprise me if they turned out to be a user. When the number is 70%, what kind of closure would come from labeling 103 players from one season as users? When the number is 70%, who gets the asterisk? Do we put it on any and all records in the 'era'? Lastly, when the number is 70% don't be stupid as a fan, and call out others because you never know who was using on your own team. So all you Red Sox fans who called out the Yankees and said the 4 World Series rings were invalidated, your count is now 90. As in 90 years since your last championship.
For the record, I don't think anything should dampen the "steroid era." It was what it was, lets clean it up, and move on. The blame should not rest on the shoulders of a few, but on baseball as a whole.
Three change in my fantasy baseball league. I dropped Daniel Murphy and picked up Willie Taveras. Dropped Carlos Marmol and Yadier Molina with Ervin Santana and John Lackey (those two pitches looked great) coming off the DL. Grab Murphy as a power binge is about to come and Marmol should be the closer within two weeks. I'm now 4-1-1 and almost lost this week due to two closers 'getting work' and giving up more runs than outs they got.
